Last Update:
Nov 7, 2025
Share
Product-led growth beats paid marketing: Companies like Cursor ($500M ARR) and Midjourney ($500M ARR) spent $0 on ads by making users their distribution channel
Generous free tiers accelerate adoption: Cursor's 2,000 free completions and Otter.ai's 600 free minutes drove viral bottom-up growth
Small teams, massive revenue: Midjourney generated $12.5M per employee with just 40 people; Lovable hit $17M ARR with 18 employees
Frictionless onboarding is non-negotiable: Time to value under 2 minutes separates explosive growth from stagnation
Built-in virality compounds: Every user action (sharing code, images, meeting notes) becomes a distribution event
Self-serve revenue scales faster: Eliminating "contact sales" friction enabled these companies to add 1,000+ customers daily
A coding tool launches with no sales team, no marketing budget, and no ads. Within months, it's processing a billion transactions daily.
An AI image generator builds a $500M business with 40 employees. No website. No landing page. Just a Discord server.
A transcription app scales to processing over 1 billion meetings without hiring a single sales rep.
These aren't fairy tales. They're real companies that cracked a code most SaaS founders never discover: the best go-to-market strategy isn't something you bolt onto your product. It's something you build into it.
Here's how they did it and more importantly, how the principles apply no matter what SaaS product you're building.

The Cursor Revelation: When Your Users Become Your Sales Force
An AI coding IDE launches with zero sales team, zero marketing budget, and zero paid advertising. No SDRs. No demand gen campaigns. Not even a LinkedIn ads account.
Within months, they're handling a billion code completions every day.
That's Cursor, and their story flipped everything we thought we knew about SaaS go-to-market on its head.
Here's what they did: they gave away 2,000 AI code completions per month completely free. No credit card required. No "book a demo" gates. Just pure value, instantly accessible. They called it a "self-replicating GTM engine," and that's exactly what it became.
Every developer who used Cursor became an evangelist. Not because Cursor asked them to. Not because there was a referral program. But because the product was so good that not sharing it felt like hoarding a secret.
Their acquisition channels? Word-of-mouth and community virality. That's it. Developers would post their code completions on Twitter. They'd demo it in Discord servers. They'd recommend it on Reddit threads about development tools. Each user was a walking, talking advertisement.
The brilliant part was the onboarding. Cursor could auto-import VS Code settings and configurations, meaning developers were up and running in minutes. The time to "aha moment" was nearly instant. And because there was no credit card barrier, almost every trial converted to active use.
Think about the economics here. Traditional enterprise SaaS might spend $50,000 to $100,000 to acquire a customer through field sales. Cursor's customer acquisition cost? Essentially zero. Their entire GTM motion was product-led, community-driven growth.
When users inevitably needed more than the free tier offered, they upgraded to Pro ($20-$40/month) or the new Ultra plan ($200/month). No sales call needed. No negotiation. Just a self-serve upgrade when the value was already proven.

Grammarly's Invisible Sales Team: 30 Million Users Who Don't Know They're Selling
Here's where it gets fascinating. We started studying Grammarly because their numbers seemed impossible: over 30 million users, with most of their growth coming from channels that cost almost nothing.
Their GTM approach? Let the product sell itself so aggressively that traditional marketing becomes optional.
Every time someone uses Grammarly, they're broadcasting it to the world. Those red underlines in shared docs? That's free advertising. When someone catches an embarrassing typo thanks to Grammarly, they tell their colleagues. When a team document suddenly has better grammar, people ask what changed.
The genius of their freemium model wasn't just about converting free users to paid (though they do that brilliantly). It was about creating a growth flywheel where every free user was a potential acquisition channel for more free users. Understanding how to improve SaaS dashboard UX for conversions meant Grammarly kept their interface clean and value-focused, not cluttered with upsell prompts.
Their content marketing strategy was equally smart. They created massive amounts of SEO-optimized content around writing improvement keywords, driving tens of millions of organic visits. But unlike typical content marketing, this wasn't top-of-funnel awareness. People searching for "how to improve my writing" were already experiencing the pain. Grammarly just showed up with the solution.
The product had innate virality built in. Any shared document or public writing showed Grammarly's suggestions. Non-users would see it and wonder, "What tool is that?" The visible corrections created organic word-of-mouth – people asking others about their secret weapon for better writing.
Installation was frictionless. Sign up with Google or Facebook, install the Chrome extension, start writing. The product showed value in the first session, not the first month. This friction-free experience meant extensions saw roughly 50% activation rates – half of all installers became active users. When you fix SaaS login screen UX issues by removing unnecessary barriers, activation rates naturally soar.
The expansion strategy was equally elegant. Free users got a taste of premium features daily – just enough to see what they were missing. Grammarly called this the "three daily premium suggestions" strategy. It's brilliant psychology: give people value, then show them there's more available. It's not a paywall; it's an invitation. The subtle micro-interactions on SaaS screen design – like highlighting premium suggestions in a distinct color – made upgrades feel natural, not forced.
For businesses, they deployed it across teams, creating organizational lock-in. Once a company's communications improved because of Grammarly Business, removing it felt like a step backward. Retention became nearly automatic.

Lovable's Insane Growth: 1,500 Customers Per Day With Built-In Virality
When we first heard about Lovable hitting $17M ARR in just three months, we assumed it was paid acquisition on steroids. We were completely wrong.
Lovable's GTM strategy was to make every user creation a marketing asset.
Here's the unlock: they built an AI-powered web IDE where every app you create gets a shareable URL. Not hidden behind a login. Not locked in a private workspace. Every creation could be instantly shared, promoting the tool automatically.
They called it "built-in virality," and it worked like wildfire. Users would build something cool, share the link on Twitter or LinkedIn, and suddenly dozens of people would click through and think, "Wait, I can build this too?"
But they didn't stop at product virality. Lovable pursued what they called a "multichannel strategy" – over a dozen channels running in parallel. Social media (LinkedIn, Twitter, Discord, Reddit). SEO and content marketing for queries like "AI code generator." Community platforms (Product Hunt, GitHub). Partnerships. Podcasts. Even some ads.
The key was that none of these channels carried the full weight of growth. Instead, they all reinforced each other. A Product Hunt launch drove signups. Those users created apps. They shared those apps on Twitter. That drove more signups. The podcast appearances brought awareness. The awareness drove search volume. The search volume fed their SEO efforts.
At peak, they were adding 1,500 new customers per day. That's not a typo. Roughly one new customer every minute of every day.
Their pricing supported this growth. A credit-based freemium model with five free credits per day. Enough to build something real and get hooked, but constrained enough that active users would want to upgrade. Pro was $25/month, Business was $50/month, with seat-unlimited access across a workspace.
The onboarding was brilliant. No credit card required. Sign up, and immediately try Lovable in-browser. Your first prompt yields a usable app in minutes. That instant gratification drove activation rates through the roof.
What really accelerated their growth was an unplanned phenomenon: "Lovable Agencies." Freelance developers and founders started using Lovable to build apps for clients. Each agency became its own distribution channel, exposing more people to the platform.
The lesson? Design your GTM strategy so users naturally become distributors. Don't hope for word-of-mouth. Engineer it into how your product works.

Otter.ai: How to Scale Without a Single Sales Rep
This one challenged everything we thought we knew about enterprise SaaS.
Otter.ai built a bottom-up, product-led growth motion in the enterprise market and scaled to processing over 1 billion meetings without hiring a single sales rep initially. Zero. Not "small sales team." Actually zero.
Their GTM insight was profound: in a meeting tool, every user is a potential acquisition channel because meetings are collaborative by nature.
Here's how it worked: Someone in a company would sign up for Otter's free tier – which included a shockingly generous 600 free transcription minutes per month. In an industry where competitors charged $1 per minute, this seemed financially insane.
But it was genius.
That person would use Otter in a meeting. Suddenly, everyone in that meeting received accurate, searchable transcripts. Those attendees, who never signed up for anything, were now exposed to the product. Many of them would sign up to access their transcripts. Some would start using Otter in their own meetings. The viral loop compounded.
Otter's acquisition channels were baked into product usage. The Zoom partnership was particularly brilliant – they became Zoom's primary transcription service, instantly plugging into millions of users. Every meeting became a distribution event.
Their "give away the store" pricing strategy seemed counterintuitive, but it was strategic. Free usage drove adoption. Adoption drove organizational spread. Once enough people in a company were using Otter, the company itself would become a sales target for enterprise plans.
Here's where it gets really smart: Otter tracked usage patterns to identify which companies had clusters of active users. They could see, "Hey, 47 people at Acme Corp are using Otter across Sales, Marketing, and Product." That became their sales pipeline.
The land-and-expand motion was built into the product mechanics. One user invites their team. The team invites other teams. Usage spreads organically. Then Otter's team (eventually they did hire sales for enterprise) would approach with tailored pitches, often with internal champions already advocating for company-wide adoption.
The expansion was remarkable. Companies that started with sub-$100K contracts would grow to $1M+ in a year. Not because of aggressive upselling, but because usage naturally expanded as more teams discovered the value.
The key lesson from Otter: in B2B SaaS, your product usage can be your entire sales motion if you design it right. Every collaborative action should expose non-users to value.

Midjourney: The $500M Company With No Website
Now this is where conventional GTM wisdom goes out the window.
Midjourney built a $500M ARR business with roughly 40 employees. They did it without a website. Without ads. Without a traditional go-to-market strategy of any kind.
Instead, they launched entirely on Discord.
Think about how radical that decision was. No landing page to optimize. No marketing site to build. No funnel to track. Just a Discord server with a bot that generates AI images when you type /imagine.
Their acquisition channel was pure social virality. Users would generate stunning AI images and share them on Twitter, Instagram, and Reddit. Each image was inherently shareable, and each one prompted the question: "How did you make this?"
The answer led back to Midjourney. Every viral image was free marketing. Every showcase was social proof. Every jaw-dropping creation made more people want access.
Discord itself became the onboarding flow. New users would join the server, watch others generate images in real-time, learn by example, and try their own prompts. The community taught each other, eliminating the need for formal tutorials or documentation. This approach to reduce user dropoff on SaaS setup screen was revolutionary – there was no setup screen at all.
Over 20 million people eventually joined the official Discord server. That's not a user base. That's a movement.
Their pricing model was clever: tiered subscriptions based on GPU compute time. Basic at $10/month for 200 minutes, Pro at $60/month for 30 hours, up to Mega for power users. No per-image fees. No confusing credits. Just predictable monthly subscriptions that scaled with usage.
The retention strategy was continuous product innovation. New model versions (V5, V6), style improvements, new capabilities like video generation. Each update created community buzz that brought back dormant users and activated new ones.
What Midjourney proved: for viral AI consumer products, you don't need traditional GTM infrastructure. You need a product so compelling that users can't help but share it, and a community so engaged they become your marketing team.

Replit: Layering GTM on Top of Organic Growth
Replit's story is particularly instructive because we can see the evolution from pure product-led growth to a more sophisticated GTM motion.
Initially, Replit grew through classic PLG: a free in-browser IDE that appealed to students, educators, and hobbyists. Growth came via viral loops (sharing projects, classrooms adopting it) and developer communities. No marketing budget. No sales team. Just a useful product spreading organically.
When they launched their AI Agent (Ghostwriter), they doubled down on what was working while adding more structured GTM elements.
The founder, Amjad Masad, leveraged his social following to create hype on Twitter and YouTube. But this wasn't traditional influencer marketing. It was genuine founder-led evangelism. He was excited about what they were building, and that excitement was contagious.
They invested heavily in SEO and content marketing. The Replit blog and documentation saw millions of monthly visitors from coding queries. They created tutorials, wrote about programming concepts, and became a resource hub for developers. This content wasn't just marketing; it was genuinely useful, which made it effective.
They ran community events: hackathons, webinars, partnerships with other dev tools. Each event exposed more developers to Replit while strengthening community ties.
But here's what's fascinating: as they added these GTM layers, they kept the product-led core intact. The onboarding remained frictionless. New users could still sign up and start coding in seconds. Templates and immediate environment spin-up meant the time to value stayed minimal.
Their pricing evolution shows GTM maturity. They started with fixed tiers, then moved to effort-based pricing for AI features. Simple tasks cost less than $0.25, complex ones more. This aligned cost with value delivered, making pricing feel fair rather than extractive.
The results speak for themselves: Replit grew from $2.8M to $150M ARR in roughly one year. That's not just product-market fit. That's product-market fit amplified by smart, layered GTM execution.
The lesson here: you can start product-led, but as you scale, adding thoughtful GTM structure accelerates growth without sacrificing the organic motion that got you there.

UiPath: When Community Becomes Your Channel
UiPath's approach was different from the others – more sales-led, but with a community twist that made it remarkable.
They pioneered the RPA category by investing heavily in category education. But instead of traditional enterprise marketing, they created the UiPath Academy – free training and certifications for anyone who wanted to learn robotic process automation.
This was GTM brilliance disguised as corporate social responsibility.
By giving away world-class training for free, UiPath created an entire workforce of RPA specialists who knew their platform. These weren't UiPath employees. They were practitioners in companies worldwide who had UiPath expertise.
When those companies decided they needed RPA solutions, guess which platform the newly certified specialists recommended? The one they already knew.
UiPath amassed 1.5 million users by 2021 through this community-building approach. Their forums became self-service support channels with over 150,000 members, driving 70% of web traffic while cutting support costs.
Their acquisition channels were primarily inbound and partner-driven. SEO-rich content, free certifications, and community buzz attracted leads. A global network of resellers and system integrators fed the pipeline. Founder-led evangelism created industry buzz.
The land-and-expand motion was legendary. Start with one robot in one department. Show value. Then upsell: deploy more robots, increase seats, expand to new use cases. Their net dollar retention was over 150% – meaning existing customers were expanding usage faster than any were churning.
The insight: in enterprise markets, building a community of practitioners who know your platform is more valuable than any marketing campaign. Those practitioners become your distributed sales force.

Character.AI: Monetizing Massive Engagement
Character.AI's GTM teaches us about converting viral consumer adoption into sustainable revenue.
They launched with a product that was inherently shareable: AI chatbots of celebrities and fictional characters. Users would have entertaining conversations, screenshot them, and share them on social media. Each share was organic marketing that brought new users.
The viral loop was self-sustaining. Funny chats went viral on Twitter and TikTok. People clicked through to try it themselves. They had entertaining conversations. They shared those too. The cycle continued.
Within months, they had roughly 20 million active users with deep engagement – averaging 30 minutes per session. That's not casual usage. That's people genuinely hooked on the product.
Their monetization was careful. The core chat service remained unlimited and free. In May 2023, they introduced c.ai+ at $9.99/month (or $7.92/month annually). Paid subscribers got faster responses, priority access without queues, and early access to new features.
The freemium balance was delicate. They kept the free tier fully functional (no conversation limits) to maintain growth, but created friction points – queues during peak times, slower responses – that nudged power users toward upgrading.
The lesson: with massive free adoption, you can monetize a small percentage and still build a significant business. The key is not killing the free experience while giving paying users clear, valuable upgrades.

Loom: From Pure PLG to Product-Led GTM
Loom's evolution shows how to mature from early-stage PLG into scaled growth without losing your soul.
Their early GTM was textbook product-led. A free Chrome extension that made async video messaging stupidly easy. Every video created a shareable link. Each share was an ad. The product's viral loop drove organic growth.
The founders obsessed over user experience, iterating daily based on feedback. They built a public feature roadmap, involving users directly in product evolution. This customer obsession turned users into evangelists.
The onboarding was pristine. Install the extension (no credit card), click "Record," immediately create a shareable video. The first recording was the "aha moment." Time to value: under 60 seconds. Loom understood that when you fix confusing SaaS screen flow, you eliminate the biggest barrier between curiosity and conversion.
As they grew, they layered on team features and enterprise capabilities. The transition from individual users to company-wide deployments required admin consoles, video libraries, security controls. They timed this perfectly with the pandemic remote work boom.
By 2020, they'd grown from 4 million to 14 million users (across 200,000 companies). Slack and LinkedIn were among their clients. The growth came from that PLG foundation: use free → see value → upgrade to Teams → expand company-wide.
Atlassian eventually acquired them, validating the model. But the lesson isn't about the exit. It's about how Loom evolved from pure product-led to what's now called "product-led GTM" – where the product drives growth, but you add sales and marketing layers to accelerate enterprise adoption.
The Pattern We Couldn't Ignore
After months of studying these companies, a clear pattern emerged. The ones with explosive growth shared specific GTM characteristics:
Product-Led as Foundation: Every company started with a product so good that people wanted to share it. Not "good enough." Actually remarkable. The product was the primary acquisition channel.
Viral Mechanics Built In: Cursor's code completions, Grammarly's visible corrections, Lovable's shareable URLs, Otter's meeting transcripts, Midjourney's images, Loom's video links – each product naturally exposed non-users to value through normal usage.
Generous Free Tiers: Not "14-day trial" generous. Actually generous. Cursor's 2,000 completions/month. Otter's 600 transcription minutes. Grammarly's unlimited basic corrections. These weren't loss leaders. They were strategic investments in bottom-up adoption.
Frictionless Onboarding: Time to value measured in seconds or minutes, not days. No credit card barriers. No extensive form fills. No mandatory tutorials. Just immediate value.
Self-Serve Revenue: When users needed more, they could upgrade themselves. No "contact sales" bottlenecks. No forced demos. The product had proven its value; payment was just unlocking more of what they already loved.
Community as Channel: Whether Discord servers, user forums, social sharing, or practitioner communities, these companies turned users into active participants in growth.
What This Means for Your GTM Strategy
We're not suggesting you need to copy these approaches exactly. Your market, your product, your stage – they all matter.
But the principles translate:
Start with product-led. Even if you plan to build a sales team eventually, begin with a product users want to share. Your best early GTM is word-of-mouth driven by genuine value.
Design virality into core workflows. Don't bolt on referral programs later. Think about how your product naturally exposes non-users to value through normal usage.
Make onboarding stupid simple. Every extra step costs you users. Ruthlessly eliminate friction. Get to value in minutes, not days.
Be generous with free value. The companies that "gave away the store" often grew fastest. Free users aren't a cost center; they're a distribution channel.
Let data inform expansion. Otter tracked which companies had user clusters. UiPath watched for departments with high adoption. Use product data to identify expansion opportunities.
Build community early. Whether it's Discord, forums, or user groups, community creates sticky networks that accelerate growth and retention.
Layer sales when it makes sense. Replit and Loom showed that you can add sales and marketing structure without killing the product-led motion. But do it after product-market fit, not before.
The Future of SaaS GTM
What we're witnessing is a fundamental shift in how software companies grow.
The traditional model – build product, hire sales team, do outbound, close deals – still works. But it's increasingly expensive and slow.
The emerging model – build remarkable product, optimize for virality, leverage community, add revenue mechanisms – scales faster and more efficiently.
Cursor handling a billion completions daily with zero marketing spend. Lovable hitting $17M ARR in three months with organic growth. Midjourney reaching $500M ARR with 40 people. These aren't outliers anymore. They're proof of a new paradigm.
The companies getting this right are growing faster, operating more efficiently, and building stronger moats (network effects and community) than traditional SaaS ever could.
The question isn't whether this model works. The examples prove it does. The question is: how do you adapt these principles to your specific market and product?
Because here's the reality: as more companies adopt product-led, community-driven GTM strategies, the ones that don't will find traditional channels increasingly expensive and less effective.
The future belongs to products that sell themselves and users who can't help but share them.








